Full description not available
H**R
Ok
Ok
D**S
good value
arrived as expected. good value
S**S
Every article has one good tip
It's not dense material but they are good articles. You pretty much get one tip from every article. I could probably condense what I learned it two pages but they give all of the evidence behind it.
M**N
What I was looking for
Good quality collection of the JAMA evidence guideline on the appraisal of medical literature.
J**N
Great book
This book is quite useful - it's as described. It gives the evidence for diagnosing based on physical exam. You don't waste your time on things that don't actually tell you anything, but you do know what's useful.
C**S
very helpful
Very helpful. I recommend for anyone wanting to do good histories and physical examinations.Well written and thorough. That is all
C**.
good
This gives study results about what exam findings actually represent disease and which are a waste of time. Great for a documentation review as well.
A**P
Not what I thought it would be
I've taught physical diagnosis to med students, as well as other trainees at various levels, for almost 50 years. I thought I might want to brush up on some of the newer concepts, in which physical diagnosis findings are interpreted in a manner analogous to lab results, with such terms as sensitivity (how good a test is at picking up a disease in those who have it) and specificity (how good a test is at not "falsely accusing" the healthy. This book is exhaustive in its mathematical analyses and references, but you lose the forest for the trees. I'm sure it serves a purpose, but alas, not for me.
Trustpilot
1 day ago
2 months ago