Baleaf Women's 3D Padded Bicycle Cycling Underwear Black Size XL

The Baleaf Women’s 4D Padded Cycling Shorts are comfy for cycling and provide good support. They make longer rides more comfortable and are practical as undershorts for everyday use on the bike

Helt enligt specifikation. Perfekta

A solução ideal para andar de bicicleta! Acabementos muito bons e muito confortáveis!

tallaje un poco grande pero de calidad bien

Context: I wore this padded cycling underwear under some black shorts on a 10-day bike-packing trip in Europe this month (Sep 2025). I cycled an average of 45km per day and between 150-500 metre of ascent. For reference, I have never bike-packed before and I've generally only commuted by bike or cycled around for leisure (flat and hills) for a few hours at a time -- and that was a few years ago, so this was the first time I'd cycled properly since then! However I do a lot of exercise, especially hiking and running marathons/ultra-marathons. Pros: Although there was still pain from the saddle, it was definitely minimised by using these padded knickers. Most days, I chose to wear some small underpants underneath these just for extra cleanliness. When I washed them (by hand in sink) they dried quickly. The quality is good and they are stretchy. They're not tight around my upper thigh/crotch area (I have larger thighs than average). Cons: Based on the reviews, I chose to buy two sizes larger than my normal size (UK 12-14, where 14 is a bit loose on me so more comfy). I just don't understand why when you click on the 'Size Chart' link, the subheading says 'UK CYCLING KNICKERS' and yet they only provide the sizing in 'U.S. size'. According to a quick internet search, UK 12-14 is a US 8-10, and based on the sellers Size Chart, I should buy a Medium. However, I'm glad I bought an XL (which would be a UK size 20-22!!). And, even then, I still had a small muffin top! Overall, I do like them and they're generally comfy despite the little muffin top, but why is the sizing so misleading?!