Muhammad: Prophet of Peace Amid the Clash of Empires

This is an excellent book, Juan Cole as an Historian provides evidence consistently from the Quran that Muhammad was peaceful, and that all wars were waged in self-defence. More over he also proves that the Quran respects Jews and Christians. These are just two of the many examples Juan Cole gives which are right below Surah The Cow verse 2:190 says “fight in the path of God those who enter into combat against you, but do not commit aggression. God does not love aggressors.” Surah The Cow Verse 2:62 Proclaims, Those who believed, and the Jews, ,and the Christians, and the Sabians, and whoever has believed in God and the Last Day and performed good works, they shall have their reward with their lord.

I loved this book. It draws a lot of its sources for evidence in the Quran itself. At the end it lists all the references to peace that have been mentioned in it. The book emphasises the ecumenical nature of Islam and its desire to bring together all monotheistic beliefs. And it stresses the absolute opposition of the Quranic message to coercion of conscience and aggression (use of violence for non-defensive reasons).

Interesting book. Very well researched perspectives...great read

The book came it ripped and the corner are bent

In this book, Juan Cole, Professor of History at the University of Michigan and a renowned authority on the modern Middle East and South Asia, takes us on a journey through the early history of Islam. He raises the most controversial question of all, was Muhammad a belligerent prophet who forced Islam by the sword? Cole theorises that there was a form of unorthodox alliance between the early Muslims and Christian nations, not least the Roman Empire. This goes against the common historical notion that Islam was constantly at war with Rome. He concludes, also based on the Quran and Sunnah, that Islam was deeply sympathetic to the 'monotheistic' Christians in their struggle against the non-believers. This, consolidated by the Islamic/Quranic perspectives on Christ, facilitated the spread of Islam in the predominately Christian communities in places like the Levant and Egypt. Moving away from the traditional, Orientalist Western scholarship on Islam and Muhammad, the author argues that Islamic conquests in most part fell within the concept of defensive 'just war.' Muhammad and his followers, who suffered a tremendous amount of abuse in Arabia, were forced to fight not only for the message of God but also, if not primarily, for their very existence. According to Cole, Muhammad succeeded in creating rich and harmonious multi-cultural societies outside Arabia. This in itself both followed and contradicted the trajectory of history at the time. Driven by the power of faith and also because of the socio-economic necessities of a growing nation (later, empire), the spread of Islam was inevitable. Contradicting the nature and ‘historical logic’ of most of the existing empires at the time, Islam - as a conquering power - maintained, enriched, and was itself influenced by the local cultures in the conquered nations. This led to the creation of a multi-cultural society, if not large identity. This book can be described as a sober academic endeavour and certainly adds to the mountain of literature on, for, or against Islam. Highly recommended.

This is a pack of lies. Has the writer not read Sura 9 in the Quran?

This book is dangerously misleading revisionist nonsense.

historical lies and fiction , but fun if you like that sort of thing . reminds me the work of Ferdinand Wustenfeld , another historian who was on the arab ,Arian payrole. people will lie easily for fortune.

At first i did not like the book because i thought it was giving too much attention to the political situation of the arabia and the world. I felt like i was with a tour guide touring the area. I even thought of returning the book but decided to read it. But after first chapter it became interesting and focused more on the topic and justified the title. I am glad i finsihed it. Very well researched and enlightening book.

Beautifully written, "Muhammad, Prophet of Peace" is a brilliant and compelling work. The central focus of the book is on the teachings of Muhammad and the Qur’an, as well as on Muhammad’s life. The book is based most extensively on the text of the Qur’an, as a primary source, as well as an array of other sources, mostly in Arabic, English, French and German. Among the sources are references to the work of Roman historians, to St. Augustine, to medieval and modern-day scholars of Islam. The subject matter of the book is at the intersection of religion and history. One of the characteristics of the book that appeals most is not only its exceptional intellectual analysis, but also its very accessible writing. The book has the erudition of an academic treatise but reads like an interesting narrative. Professor Cole makes a compelling case that what Muhammad preached was peace. The work is situated within the geo-political context of the 6th and 7th century Middle East, and the competition between the Eastern Roman Empire and Sasanian Persia, initially led by Khosrow II. The comparisons and contrasts with other religions are among the fascinating aspects of the book. The central focus is on Muhammad’s teachings, with extensive references to Christianity and Judaism. Professor Cole’s study is equitable to all religions discussed. In an in-depth final part, he addresses the fact that the message of peace preached by Muhammad has been misappropriated in subsequent times and used to justify offensive warfare. Muhammad’s key teachings included “the prohibitions on coercion of conscience and on aggressive warfare.” The final part of the book addresses in depth the subsequent misappropriation at times, after Muhammad’s lifetime, of his teachings. Professor Cole analyzes both the “how” and “why” aspects of this issue, from the standpoint of theology and history. He also discusses other religions, originating in the Middle East and South Asia, whose peaceful message was, at times, subsequently misappropriated. The book explores what the Qur’an says about peace and war. Battle, according to the Qur’an, is a legitimate response to aggression, which the book indicates is similar to what St. Augustine stated about defensive warfare. Professor Cole also writes about passages that give insight into the Qur’an’s theory of social peace (from The Pilgrimage chapter in the Qur’an). According to this chapter of the Qur’an, when one people launches aggression, others must restrain them, in an effort to establish collective security (p. 148). Professor Cole explains the evolution of years of Roman discourse (especially 300s-400s CE) on breaches of peace. It is fascinating to find out how it had changed from when the Roman Empire had been pagan (at the time of Cicero) to when it adopted Christianity as the new religion. The book analyzes the Constitution of Medina in the early 620s, which was part of forging a social contract among the clans of Medina and delineating community relations. The constitution offers a vision of a non-doctrinal, religiously multicultural society based on communal loyalty, granting of security, and mechanisms for settling torts, which establishes obligations of non-belligerence in the city of the Prophet. The book’s readable and scholarly account of Muhammad’s message and the events which took place in the Middle East in the 6th and 7th century is compelling. Professor Cole critically examines sources, some of which, for example those alluding to war between Byzantium and clans in Arabia, are anachronistic (p. 182). He explains that this conflict occurred after the death of Muhammad, not during his lifetime. At times the book cites Christian theologians, such as St. Augustine as rendering an accurate analysis. At other times, Professor Cole points out that, as in the case of Bishop Sophronios, the latter’s statements are unsubstantiated by historical record. The book references at certain points biographers of Muhammad- but considers those in light of the Qur’an, and the rich array of historical and theological sources available. Very interesting in terms of geo-political context is that the later Roman Empire, under Herakleios, still had republican remnants, with the Senate as an important consultative body. This model, according to the book, which differed from the absolute monarchy of Khosrow II of Iran, may have been important for Muhammad’s views on the Roman Empire. Those views would have also been influenced by the Arab preference for the consultation between clan chiefs over centralized power (p. 134). Among the discussion of the rich array of events is a comprehensive explanation of the dynamics between Mecca and Medina, and of the Treaty of Hudaibiya (reconstructed from historical sources). There is also an account of Muhammad’s trips to Damascus and his interactions with other faiths; as well as his views on the Roman empire. The narrative of “Muhammad, Prophet of Peace Amid the Clash of Empires” has been written within the theological context of the teachings of Muhammad, and it draws parallels and contrasts with Christianity and Judaism. The narrative closely follows the life of the Prophet. Geopolitically, the events in the book are based within the context of the power struggle between the Eastern Roman Empire and the Sasanian Iranian Empire. The appendix contains the multiple verses on peace from the Qur’an that are relevant to the book. Overall, “Muhammad, Prophet of Peace Amid the Clash of Empires” is a brilliant book, which gives the reader fascinating insight into a complex era. It is written beautifully and contains compelling, expert analysis.

Received in good condition

Juan Cole, Professor of History at Michigan University in Ann Arbor, has suggested interesting theories about the overall peaceful intent of the Qur’an. In times of intensified Islamophobia not only in the US his revision of certain key surahs in the context of geopolitical events in the 7th century are most welcome. That the new faith should be spread by the sword, or through holy war, cannot be found in the Qur’an. Cole’s comprehensible approach is that he carefully re-reads the scripture but considers the prophet’s biography, al-Sira al-Nabawiyya, which had been formulated long after the unprecedented triumph of Islam and far-reaching conquests under the Umayyad and Abbasid caliphs, as unreliable hagiography. Later Muslims had to paint the picture of an illiterate Prophet who was not even aware of the scriptures of the two other monotheistic religions in order to protect him from being accused of plagiarism. In contrast, Cole is right when he characterizes Muhammad, wealthy business woman Khadija’s husband, as highly skilled and educated international tradesman who frequently traveled with his caravans to the economic and cultural centers of Palestine and the Levant. Muhammad had heard, with horror, of Jerusalem’s fall to the Sasanian general Sharbaraz in 614, just after surah ar-Rum had been revealed. Numerous neologisms in the Qur’an prove that Muhammad mastered Aramaic as well as possibly Greek. He was well aware of then popular stories like the Alexander Romance as well as the tale of the Seven Sleepers. Both stories are referred to in surah 18 (al-Kahf). Cole interestingly interprets the conflict between Mecca and Medina as sort of a proxy war of the two main adversaries in the first half of the 7th century, the Byzantine and Sasanian Empires. It becomes clear that Mecca (Sasanian sphere of influence) was the aggressor while Muhammad was able to capture Mecca in 630 without any bloodshed. The unholy blending of what can be found in the Qur’an and highly unreliable ahadith (the traditions of the Prophet) and sira in later centuries has done lots of damage to the religion of Islam. Umayyad and Abbasid violent conquests and civil wars may remind us of another Islamic tradition, the Shi’a. The members of the Prophet’s family, the descendants of his cousin Ali and daughter Fatimah, had been subject for centuries of persecution. The Shi’a Imams had always claimed to be the rightous spiritual (and political) successors of the Prophet, having access to and being able to interpret the divine law. They were decidedly pious and defensive and all were martyred by Umayyad or Abbasid usurpers. Cole does not entertain this interesting aspect of an entirely peaceful Islam in his book.

Brilliant book