You Don't Know JS: Scope & Closures 1st Edition

This is an excellent book overall. I can use it to improve my understanding of JavaScript and thereby also improve own JavaScript code. I think what won me over to the book was reading some of the bits of how Javascript code compilation occurs, starting with tokenizing, and the "conversations" between Engine, Compiler and Scope. I realized I needed to read the book cover to cover. A few months after purchasing the book, I'm getting near the end of it, and thoroughly enjoying it. The book explains scope and closures in great detail, with example code that is repeatable (although if you want to use the 'let' verb within a script that will be executed by the Node.js v0.10.31 engine, you will need to do that in strict mode and use the --harmony flag.)I will need to re-read this book a few times over for the examples and discussion to really strike home, but I have had several moments already where the author helps me understand why my own application code is having trouble. For example, I'm having variable collisions and I'm not using function expressions and/or immediately invoked function expressions when I really should. This book is teaching me these things and showing me a better way to code. It is helping me to think like Compiler, Scope and Engine when I see my code.This must be the first technical book I've actually read that makes fleeting reference to Luke Skywalker. Maybe JavaScript really does need someone with a "warrior aiming for excellence" viewpoint in order to convince developers to master it? Resig and Bibeault, after all, recall the ways of the ninja. Well, if I were to compare myself to a warrior, it would have to be as a recruit in the most basic training camp. Even in this setting I can accomplish more with a close study of this book. I might even become a pretty good coder. For others, I'm sure they can rise to the ninja or even the Skywalker planes.In fact this book is so good that I ordered the other print book and pre-ordered all the titles which will be released in November for this series.Let us look at the ways this book could be improved:The author uses parenthetical (writing too much). For example:"We take an inner function (named timer)..."could just as easily be written without the parentheses:"We take an inner function named timer...". I personally find parenthetized text distracts me from the real point the author is trying to make.There are loads of "crow" icons in the book (meaning general notes), but no "squirrel" (to signify a tip or suggestion) or "lobster" (warning) icons. I'd love to see some squirrels! The reader has to decide when the author must be passing on a coding tip. Or perhaps he doesn't want to mess with that?There is no book index.There is no history of how the book was funded over Kickstarter, and I would love to know more about that.With that said, this book is worth every penny of my money and I expect the entire series will be, too. If you are a beginner at JavaScript, buy this book!

I have been writing JavaScript for years now and the more I write / read code the more I realize I have a lot to learn. YDKJS: Scope and Closures really helped solidify the open questions I had about closures and what lexical scopes actually were (how they come to be defined). I really enjoyed how scoped (pun intended) this book was. I feel a lot of very valuable information is left out when you write a book to give a general (definitive) overview of the language or its good parts. And with this book, you really are only worried about scopes and closures so you get the full depth of this area without having to consult the rather convoluted standard's specs. Mind you, these are difficult concepts to teach / learn so it was refreshing to see it was all spelled out with great clarity and good examples.I would venture to say that there is probably something, if not, a whole bunch of things that developers will learn from this book.With that, I will be recommending this to all of my colleagues to read and recommending it to anyone who wants to make sure they have a firm understanding of the tools they are wielding.Great work Kyle!

This book will for sure suffer from polarized opinions, but I have no doubt it will become one of the most influential and popular JavaScript books. I came from a Java/Scala background. There are many books that discuss the deep features of those languages and how they are implemented. Through reading them, you get a very nice picture of those languages.It is not the same about JavaScript. Here are some JavaScript books I've read:Professional JavaScript for Web Developers by Nicholas C. ZakasSecrets of the JavaScript Ninja by John Resig and Bear BibeaultObject-Oriented JavaScript, 2nd Edition by Stoyan Stefanov and Kumar Chetan SharmaGranted those books are highly praised in the JS community, they failed to answer one big question: what is JavaScript? What's the functionality of JavaScript? Kyle Simpson addressed this concern open and clear in his preface that he aimed to address those questions. So for me, this is the perfect book.I am now half way through this book, and it is a very well-written book. It's short, but concise. Some people might think the short length of this book should be criticized, but I believe it's a great feature because you will have time to finish the book before the next book come out.It has a clear presentation of hard-to-understand JavaScript concepts along with occasionally visual aids. However, it is not a book for beginners. Beginners might get confused because of the pedantic nature of this book. Also, for some people, who wants more straight-forward explanation and I imagine there are many of them out there, it is unworthy of buying. This book favors jargons, and might have gone too far with them. I don't consider it a problem, but I can see how it might irritate some readers.In chapter 1, author went in a huge length letting us know the difference between LHS and RHS (two types of lookup methods), and carry them through the entire chapter. Is it important? Not really. It seems like as long as you employ the "strict mode", two methods are completely indistinguishable. I'm a graduate student and I'll take a class on compiler construction soon or later, so this little mental exercise is enjoyable for me, but again, some people might ask why presenting them if they barely makes a difference.In chapter 2, author talked about lexical scope, but almost half of the chapter is used to discuss two functions "eval()" and "with()" and then warned you to never use them. I know it sounds like I am complaining, but I'm not. I've tried to understand eval() from other resources (books and blog posts), but through reading this book is the first time I truly understand the concept, and why to avoid them.I will update this review once I finished reading the entire book. Please don't take my criticism as discouraging you from buying this book. This book will grant you the comfort and ease to write JavaScript code. However, if you are not pedantic, or only pursuing the operational side of the language (library user), you should skip the series because you will be irritated and hate this book. If you would like to look deep into JavaScript, this is perhaps the only book that will satisfy your desire right now.Btw, this book will tell you how JavaScript is a true and nicely designed programming language with compilers and execution engines. Buy it if you are from a more serious programming background (C/C++, Java, Scala, Lisp...)