TP-Link AC750 Wireless Portable Nano Travel Router(TL-WR902AC) - Support Multiple Modes,Hotspot/Bridge/Range Extender/Access Point/Client Modes, Dual Band WiFi, 1 USB 2.0 Port

Very useful for captive portal WiFi sharing..

Very useful

Bad

This product could not reach 700 mbps they advertised because lan port is 10/100 mb port so you will never reach anything faster than 100 bmps

Its not wireless this is a scam!

It a fair small Wi-Fi router with an option to use 3g-4g dongles… however it comes with a US power socket which is pretty useless in the UAE. It’s a shame that the seller does not disclose this info in the description! As a result, now I need to buy a converter for another AED 30…

Working perfectly

I purchased this item to allow for better WiFi coverage in my home. My router is in the basement and, although it is mounted in the ceiling in a central location, I do have a few spots where the coverage could be better. I also have numerous security devices outside that drop signals because the are too weak occasionally. This tiny router plugs into my ethernet switch on the main floor and the signal reaches every corner of the house from that location. The setup was a snap. I chose ethernet to Wifi, logged onto the router via the web portal provided and completed the ssid setup in just a few minutes. Once I gave the SSID unique names to differentiate between my existing router and the auxillary one and between the 5G and 2.4, I clicked save and was done. I use the same passwords for all my LANs except for the guest portal so switching my devices is easy as pie. I love the travel utility of this router also. I typically travel with at least 3 devices and if my wife comes along it can be as many as 6. Hotels tend to allow 2 per room so this will address that problem and provide a secure network at the same time. The reason that I did not give 5 stars overall is that I have fiber optic in my home and my speed is usually 170 mbbs or higher. This device claims to be capable of faster speeds by even hardwired is under 100 mbbs. Most people wont notice this or have an issue with it but, those that understand networking will might not appreciate the choking. That aside, the price, utility and ease of use make this a great value. I have to assume that those that gave it a less stellar review, are simply not tech savvy and did not understand how to set it up properly. I am very happy with the performance with the one exception noted.

I travel for work. So I am in hotels often.I LOVE the ability to plug a gadget in, and point it to the access point, and have all my devices automatically connect up. This was necessary to satisfy the problem of Google chromecast, where it requires a phone to operate, and they must be on the same wifi network. (Most hotels isolate devices to keep guests secure from each other)I bought the small nano first. And I later purchased the larger version (TL-WR902AC). So I will provide the pros and cons of each here.Please also note that I am EXCLUSIVELY using this in hotels in wi-fi only (never plugged in the RJ-45 ethernet) as a wi-fi access point for all my tech, I've not used it for anything else. There are many other features and capabilities that are not accounted for here.Nano:+ simple setup, great wizard.+ SOOOOO tiny+ Works great with Marriott/SPG hotels (and everywhere else I've tried it)- Struggles with multiple devices, the single band antenna seems to be a big restriction in speed and multiple devices.- Slow speedsBig brother (AC902 model)+ Much cleaner and more stable connections - handles all my devices brilliantly.+ Far more features (that I don't use)+ Larger than the nano (picture for reference) but still so small that it's perfect for travel- Setup is not so streamlined. Additional hardware toggle on the device makes it more confusing. (I use the middle setting, "Share Hotspot")Side-notes:I used this exclusively at a single hotel before upgrading, so the differences noticed between the two models were all at the same property.Both devices get a bit warm, but nothing concerning, and it's not at all surprising given how tightly they are packing them.Both are small enough that the only reason I would recommend the nano over the big brother is if you need something to fit in your pocket, or purse, and don't have high expectations in terms of speed.

Can't remember getting it

.

This product is a repeat order. Has served as well for years.