The Wars of the Roses: The Fall of the Plantagenets and the Rise of the Tudors

Jones provides a compelling and rousing history of the Wars of the Roses era. The Audible performance by John Curless is clear and entertaining. Jones includes an end note section, and a robust bibliography.

I loved the Plantagenet's, the first book in this series. Dan Jones has a novelist's sense of pacing and story telling - his history can be pretty biased though. The War of the Roses was a page turner that kept me up at night reading. I'm not sure that if I wasn't already familiar with the storyline - or would that be history line - that I would have been able to follow the labyrinth list of characters and battles. An explanation of who the Beauforts were and why they were important would have been helpful to a casual reader. Being from the US, the history Dan Jones relates is not second nature to me. The War of the Roses is not something we learn in school here. I often felt as though he was writing to a very knowledgeable audience - those in the UK who would have learned this history in school. It's part of their historical DNA so explaining the Beaufort history wouldn't have been necessary to those in the UK. But for those of us who weren't raised on John of Gaunt's illegitimate - later legitimate - children, I think most people would be confused as Jones never does explain this really important connection. But with that said, the book had an interesting premise that he carried through the book beautifully. Dan Jones is an excellent writer who makes medieval history come alive,

As a successor or continuation, the author does much to flesh out the conflict and personalities that created such chaos within English life and government. The weakness and flaws of some kings highlights the danger to any nation of leaders who have no buffers to their incompetence. The author writes smoothly but clearly has a perspective on the history being told. It’s a book that can be immediately read again and enjoyed.

In few histories can one see the truth that `to the victors, belongs the history' in such clarity as Jones reveals. Jones has winnowed the knowable facts from triumphalist biased history. The "War of the Roses" sounds like a romantic event except it was invented by a 19th century revisionist. You'll quickly see that there's nothing romantic here. The book begins with the obscure story of Plantagenet extinction. It's an irony that a Tudor Henry VIII would deliver a grizzly 10 whack beheading to a demographic `ancient' and last of the Plantagenet blood royal in 1541 ... 100 years after York victory at Bosworth Field. The Plantagenet dynasty so exits corporeal history in the person of Henry VIII's great-great-grandaunt. This is the story of a mighty family tree gone to war as notional `roses'. Plantagenet House Lancaster and House York simply annihilated themselves. Circumstances and peculiarity left an outsider standing. A 'Tudur' from Wales of low noble origin emerges as king. It's the time of the Tudors and the end of dynasty. Jones telling is rooted in the personalities of the kings, queens, and princes amped up by a supporting cast of doubly rough counts, dukes and bishops. The telling is necessarily complex. The story is as bizarre, pivotal and bloody as any fiction. As the publisher advance material correctly claims, `The Game of Thrones' fiction is no match. Ultimately, this is a story for a modern reader to consider `kingship' from a time not so distant. A monarchs lapse of common sense tears through a king's powerful subjects, variously assembled in cabals of self-interest who are willing and able to field formidable forces to challenge the person of the king and exterminate bloodlines. Modern warfare among cartel kingpins is no match in wrath and scale. Consider the mutilated remains of the last Plantagenet king, Richard III, buried shallow, nameless and long forgotten beneath public parking ... only discovered in 2013 and 550 years after his death in a royal history absorbed society. Perhaps there's still the chance of finding Jimmy Hoffa. Discussions with friends who have read both `The Plantagenet's' and `War of the Roses' reveals a split opinion. It's a matter of history reader preference. Do you like high fidelity history (a lot of names, personalities, interactions, dates and places) or narrative entertainment? This is hi-fi history on a grand scale. Jones repeatedly sends the history buff to wiki to explore for more.

Jones’ The Wars of the Roses reads like a novel. I believe that is simply that this period in English history is wilder than any storyteller could fabricate. In the early part of the fifteenth century, it appeared that England was on the rise. It had a stable, capable government led by a king who is arguably the best monarch in the country’s history (Shakespeare thought so). It appeared that the Hundred Years’ War had been settled and England had regained much of the continental land that it had lost in the thirteenth century. Indeed, the French were going to recognize the son of Henry V as their king as well as England’s. Jones quotes Ecclesiastes 10:16 and applies it directly to England. Alas for England, Henry V died young in 1422, leaving behind a 9-month-old son. What is remarkable, actually, is that Henry had put in place a leadership team that would manage the country quite well while the young Henry VI was growing up. The problem is that Henry VI was no ruler, and by the time he was in his late twenties, the old leaders were largely gone and the next generation was vying for power with a king who did little about it. The Wars of the Roses started in earnest around 1450, and England was in a state of civil war much of the time until 1485 when Henry Tudor defeated Richard III in battle and became Henry VII. Yes, the main competing royal houses were those of Lancaster, supporters of Henry VI and his family and associates, and the Dukes of York who also claimed royal ancestry and were frustrated over Henry VI. The crown actually did change hands several times, but what is perhaps most remarkable is that nearly everyone involved in an attempt to rule or, often, simply to bring order to their own region, was killed. Some were killed in battle, but most were killed judicially. A few were assassinated. I once read the Chinese classic The Three Kingdoms. That work covers a period of about a century during a time of great civil unrest in China. It was appalling how many men were beheaded by their enemies and allies alike. I realize after reading The Wars of the Roses that fifteenth century England was not much different. I understand that Lewis Carroll’s Alice stories in part parody English history. Now I can understand where the Red Queen’s “off with his head!” came from. One of the main figures in all the intrigue is the Earl of Warwick. He had become quite powerful and something of a literal kingmaker. Still, things would catch up with him eventually. Jones believes it is no surprise that one of Warwick’s knights, Sir Thomas Malory, would write a collection of King Arthur stories to give people a sense of what a true and good king should be like, but also with an awareness of plotting and civil strife going on just below the surface. Jones describes the fascinating rise of the Tudors. It is probably even more remarkable than the rise of the Stewarts in Scotland. Owen Tudor was a Welsh nobleman. He claimed some ancestry from Welsh kings. Jones is dubious of the claims, but, of course, Welsh kings would include Arthur. He became the lover and then the wife of King Henry V’s widow. When the Yorkists were in power after 1460, the Tudors were in France and Brittany for safety. Owen’s son Edward had one son, Henry. In normal circumstances, being third cousin from one sitting king and third cousin twice removed from his rival would mean that Henry Tudor would have virtually no chance of becoming king. However, many of the people who might have been in his way had been killed or imprisoned. He did take a big risk fighting Richard III in 1485, but he had procured enough allies and Richard was killed in battle, and so he started a new dynasty. Jones does not end his history with 1485. There was something of a legacy of that bloody century. He notes a few pretenders who claimed be one of the young princes who were killed in the Tower of London. These proved to be phonies, but Henry VII was relatively merciful to them. Henry also looked with suspicion on anyone with a royal connection. As he grew older, he became more paranoid apparently, and a few somewhat harmless souls ended up being accused of treason and losing their heads. I have not read any Song of Fire and Ice books, nor do I get the Game of Thrones television show on my set, but I have certainly read enough about the program. George R. R. Martin, the author of the books, has said that he was inspired by the Wars of the Roses. Lannister even sounds like Lancaster. I suspect that fans of the television show or Martin’s book series would enjoy this book, even if it is nonfiction.

A fresh and more impartial approach to the history of the end of the Plantagenet dynasty, the trew Royals.

This is a fair and balanced look at one of the bloodiest times in England's history. I really enjoy Dan Jones' style of writing. His books do not fall into the category of "popular" history but they do read like them. He truly brings to life the bygone era of which he writes. This book is rich in details of the men and women who took part in the Wars of the Roses. I especially liked Jones' treatment of Richard III. Jones simply presented the facts of the man, both good and bad, without bias. Richard III is such a controversial figure and there are tons of books, both fiction and non, that either praise him as a misaligned saint or the malicious sinner of Shakespeare. I like that Jones stuck to historical fact without judgment, using both contemporary and near contemporary sources. Overall this is an excellent book and definitely worth reading if you have even a passing interest in the time period. The book is clear and concise, which makes it easy to follow the tangled web of the politics and battles of the time.

Though fully footnoted and thoroughly researched, it reads more like a novel. And though the outcome of each phase is likely known to the reader, it keeps you turning pages like a good cliffhanger.

This is the first book by Dan Jones I've read and I wasn't disappointed. He brings clarity to a turbulent period in which there are many events and carachters (moreover, the people involved have mostly the same names/titles: i.e. you have a duke of Gloucester as brother of the lancastrian Henry V and then a new one in the future yorkist Richard III). The book is very well written and you can hardly take your eyes off.

No thanks

bon produit

très bien, sérieux et documenté. Ça se lit comme un roman. Je recommande chaudement. cela me donne envie d'acheter son livre sur les Plantagenets qui fait authorité

This is a good quality paperback book. Accurate facts. Recipient very pleased with it.