---
product_id: 1701587
title: "On Democracy's Doorstep: The Inside Story of How the Supreme Court Brought \"One Person, One Vote\" to the United States Hardcover – June 10, 2014"
brand: "j. douglas smith"
price: "60759CFA"
currency: XOF
in_stock: true
reviews_count: 6
url: https://www.desertcart.sn/products/1701587-on-democracys-doorstep-the-inside-story-of-how-the-supreme
store_origin: SN
region: Senegal
---

# On Democracy's Doorstep: The Inside Story of How the Supreme Court Brought "One Person, One Vote" to the United States Hardcover – June 10, 2014

**Brand:** j. douglas smith
**Price:** 60759CFA
**Availability:** ✅ In Stock

## Quick Answers

- **What is this?** On Democracy's Doorstep: The Inside Story of How the Supreme Court Brought "One Person, One Vote" to the United States Hardcover – June 10, 2014 by j. douglas smith
- **How much does it cost?** 60759CFA with free shipping
- **Is it available?** Yes, in stock and ready to ship
- **Where can I buy it?** [www.desertcart.sn](https://www.desertcart.sn/products/1701587-on-democracys-doorstep-the-inside-story-of-how-the-supreme)

## Best For

- j. douglas smith enthusiasts

## Why This Product

- Trusted j. douglas smith brand quality
- Free international shipping included
- Worldwide delivery with tracking
- 15-day hassle-free returns

## Description

Full description not available

## Images

![On Democracy's Doorstep: The Inside Story of How the Supreme Court Brought "One Person, One Vote" to the United States Hardcover – June 10, 2014 - Image 1](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/71hLJVzftsL.jpg)
![On Democracy's Doorstep: The Inside Story of How the Supreme Court Brought "One Person, One Vote" to the United States Hardcover – June 10, 2014 - Image 2](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81LsursokFL.jpg)

## Customer Reviews

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 5.0 out of 5 stars







  
  
    A Superb Account
  

*by A***N on Reviewed in the United States on August 2, 2017*

This book provides an excellent account, amply corroborated by primary sources cited in the notes, of the long struggle for reapportionment of U.S. House of Representatives districts and state legislatures on the basis of "one person one vote." In a series of decisions from 1962 to 1965, the U.S. Supreme Court held that apportionment issues were not merely "political questions" beyond the reach of the federal courts, that state governments were required to devise electoral districts for the U.S. House of Representatives that were roughly equal in population, and that state legislative districts (including both houses of a bicameral legislature) had to be drawn so that each district comprised an approximately equal number of people as every other district. These decisions abolished the long-time practice of federal and state legislative districts in which people in urban or metropolitan areas were grossly underrepresented in the U.S. House of Representatives and in state legislatures.After these decisions were issued, the Senate Republican Minority Leader, Everett Dirkson of Illinois, led a years-long effort to obtain a constitutional amendment that would overrule some or all of their holdings. He worked on both of the alternative prongs of the amendment procedure in Article V of the U.S. Constitution: attempting to obtain adoption in the Congress (requiring a two-thirds majority of each house) of such a constitutional amendment to be submitted for ratification by three-fourths of the states, and, alternatively, to have the legislatures of two-thirds of the states request a federal constitutional convention in order to overrule the reapportionment decisions. Senator Dirkson was unsuccessful on both counts, though he almost succeeded in obtaining the approvals of two-thirds of the states for a new federal constitutional convention. The latter prospect horrified many people in both parties, because it was not clear whether a constitutional convention could be limited to one issue; liberal Democrats and some Republicans expressed concern that such a convention might repeal important provisions of the Bill of Rights, as least as those first ten amendments to the Constitution had been construed and applied by the contemporary Supreme Court led by Chief Justice Earl Warren.In the Epilogue of his book, the author discusses the results of these epic Supreme Court cases. The reapportionments did cause state legislatures to pay more attention to the needs of urban residents. However, even as the reapportionment battles were being waged, people were moving from urban to suburban communities that usually had little interest in the problems of the cities. These suburbs often voted Republican rather than Democrat, contrary to the expectations of many politicians and media commentators. One of the reasons for the failure of Senator Dirkson's proposed constitutional amendments is that members of his own party came to realize that they might find a strong political base in the growing suburban communities.Moreover, the legal success of reapportionment has resulted in political forces turning to different methods to ensure the political success of special interests. This book was first published in 2014. The author observes (page 283) that "after June 1964, both political parties, no longer able to gain an advantage simply by designing districts made up of wildly divergent numbers of people, came to rely on gerrymandering more than they had before. After the 1970 census and every ten years thereafter, legislators across the nation turned to gerrymandering with gusto. In October 2012, the Atlantic referred to gerrymandering as 'the dark art and modern science of making democracy a lot less democratic.'” I might add that the Supreme Court will soon be addressing the issue of partisan gerrymandering in a case it will decide in the term ending June 30, 2018: Gill v. Whitford, U.S. Supreme Court Docket No. 16-1161. It would not be surprising if the Supreme Court looked to the history of the reapportionment cases for guidance, especially on the issue of the applicability of the "political question" doctrine—the threshold justiciability question that has heretofore prevented the Court from becoming involved with partisan (as distinguished from racial) gerrymandering cases and that similarly delayed consideration by the Court of apportionment cases before its decision in Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962).The author of this book also notes (page 284) that "the Court’s historic embrace of one person, one vote comports uneasily with fears that its more recent actions may have enabled 'one dollar, one vote' to become a more accurate description of American democracy. Today, corporate interests and anti-tax groups continue to push a probusiness, anti-labor agenda of low taxes, limited government spending, and minimal regulation. The Chamber of Commerce, once Dirksen’s primary ally, has led the way as business groups, freed from spending limits by the 2010 Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, now spend tens of millions of dollars per election cycle in an effort to influence public policy."The author concludes the book with the observation (page 290) that Chief Justice Warren "understood all too well that the journey remained unfinished—and that the struggle to affirm and reaffirm the rights of individuals to a truly equal voice in a representative system of government must go on."

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 5.0 out of 5 stars







  
  
    Fascinating subject
  

*by A***Z on Reviewed in the United States on October 24, 2016*

Perhaps others will find this story dry and uninteresting, but I found it fascinating. Growing up at that time, I had no idea of this important fight going on around me. And of course the JFK assassination obscured other things. This is an important issue, and I am so pleased to have learned all about it.

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 5.0 out of 5 stars







  
  
    Five Stars
  

*by C***R on Reviewed in the United States on December 18, 2017*

good

---

## Why Shop on Desertcart?

- 🛒 **Trusted by 1.3+ Million Shoppers** — Serving international shoppers since 2016
- 🌍 **Shop Globally** — Access 737+ million products across 21 categories
- 💰 **No Hidden Fees** — All customs, duties, and taxes included in the price
- 🔄 **15-Day Free Returns** — Hassle-free returns (30 days for PRO members)
- 🔒 **Secure Payments** — Trusted payment options with buyer protection
- ⭐ **TrustPilot Rated 4.5/5** — Based on 8,000+ happy customer reviews

**Shop now:** [https://www.desertcart.sn/products/1701587-on-democracys-doorstep-the-inside-story-of-how-the-supreme](https://www.desertcart.sn/products/1701587-on-democracys-doorstep-the-inside-story-of-how-the-supreme)

---

*Product available on Desertcart Senegal*
*Store origin: SN*
*Last updated: 2026-03-05*