---
product_id: 15131639
title: "Dangerous Books For Girls: The Bad Reputation of Romance Novels, Explained"
price: "20632CFA"
currency: XOF
in_stock: true
reviews_count: 9
url: https://www.desertcart.sn/products/15131639-dangerous-books-for-girls-the-bad-reputation-of-romance-novels
store_origin: SN
region: Senegal
---

# Dangerous Books For Girls: The Bad Reputation of Romance Novels, Explained

**Price:** 20632CFA
**Availability:** ✅ In Stock

## Quick Answers

- **What is this?** Dangerous Books For Girls: The Bad Reputation of Romance Novels, Explained
- **How much does it cost?** 20632CFA with free shipping
- **Is it available?** Yes, in stock and ready to ship
- **Where can I buy it?** [www.desertcart.sn](https://www.desertcart.sn/products/15131639-dangerous-books-for-girls-the-bad-reputation-of-romance-novels)

## Best For

- Customers looking for quality international products

## Why This Product

- Free international shipping included
- Worldwide delivery with tracking
- 15-day hassle-free returns

## Description

Dangerous Books For Girls: The Bad Reputation of Romance Novels, Explained [Rodale, Maya] on desertcart.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Dangerous Books For Girls: The Bad Reputation of Romance Novels, Explained

Review: Enlightening Read - "Romance novels feature nuanced portrayals of female characters having adventures, making choices, and accepting themselves just as they are. When we say these stories are silly and unrealistic, we are telling young girls not to expect to be the heroines in their own real lives. Romance novels depict female sexuality as a loving, pleasurable, and above all acceptable part of being a happy woman. But when we call them smutty, dirty, or trashy books, we are negating that message. Romance novels portray life as we, women, would love it to be. One that recognizes our worth, rewards us for our confidence, and supports our choices. When we say these books are unrealistic, we are telling young girls, who might still be open-minded about their own opportunities, that they should lower their expectations. Romance novels show a variety of heroines, be they plain, pretty, plump, or skinny. They might be black, white, rich, poor, gay, or straight. But when we say only stupid women read these books, we are telling young girls that they are foolish for believing that they can be beautiful and loveable just the way they are. Even when we don't talk about romance novels, we are sending a message that women are not worth talking about and that they should be seen and not heard." [From Dangerous Books for Girls: The Bad Reputation of Romance Novels Explained by Maya Rodale, "Why It Matters How We Talk About Romance Novels"] Dangerous Books for Girls is an examination romance as genre primarily through the lens of gender. The author brought up a lot of points that I hadn't considered and constructs an interesting and well supported argument about how the romance genre isn't treated fairly (in comparison to contemporary lit or fantasy or historical fiction or literally any other genre) primarily due to its mostly female authorship and readership. The author also points out the likely role that the romance genre has played in social movements due to the inherent message of the stories. Despite romance's reputation for cringy bodice rippers and rapist 'heroes' - a reputation largely based on early to mid twentieth century books, not the modern genre - more recently published romances often are nuanced explorations of any number of issues, only organized around the axis of a relationship and invested in a hopeful conclusion. As the author points out, trashing an entire genre based on commonly appearing tropes is unfair in the extreme, prevents readers from picking up the books or respecting people who read the genre, and denigrates the kind of discussion and change that the themes are meant to promote. An equivalent would be trashing fantasy as a genre because the apocalypse (or whatever their specific variant is called) is a commonly used trope and saying that discussion of racism and fascism through the medium of Harry Potter is a worthless endeavor, people who read the Harry Potter are stupid anyways and no semi-intelligent person would stoop to picking up those kinds of books because they aren't worth the paper they're printed on. There are some people who feel that way about fantasy, but the author's point is that such people are comparatively few and far between when one takes into account the mass of people who think something similar about the romance genre, often without even realizing it. Overall, Dangerous Books for Girls was an enlightening read, and it is one that I would recommend to others.
Review: Good Read - Enjoyed it! But know going in that it is accurately titled. The book is survey data, historical context, and analysis about why Romance has such a reputation. I still hate traditional covers, but I enjoyed thinking about a very written-by-women, read-by-women genre --- at that angle, it constantly being trashed starts to make sense given how male-centric our society is. Not a how-to-write book, so if you are looking for that, go elsewhere. The cover is horrible and you'll get grease prints on it no matter how clean your hands are.

## Technical Specifications

| Specification | Value |
|---------------|-------|
| Best Sellers Rank | #1,187,677 in Books ( See Top 100 in Books ) #364 in Gothic & Romantic Literary Criticism (Books) #3,248 in Popular Culture in Social Sciences #4,404 in Literary Criticism & Theory |
| Customer Reviews | 4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars (131) |
| Dimensions  | 6 x 0.59 x 9 inches |
| Edition  | First Edition |
| ISBN-10  | 0990635627 |
| ISBN-13  | 978-0990635628 |
| Item Weight  | 12.5 ounces |
| Language  | English |
| Print length  | 260 pages |
| Publication date  | April 21, 2015 |
| Publisher  | Maya Rodale |

## Images

![Dangerous Books For Girls: The Bad Reputation of Romance Novels, Explained - Image 1](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51DyZgh1ZLL.jpg)

## Customer Reviews

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Enlightening Read
*by A***Y on February 24, 2021*

"Romance novels feature nuanced portrayals of female characters having adventures, making choices, and accepting themselves just as they are. When we say these stories are silly and unrealistic, we are telling young girls not to expect to be the heroines in their own real lives. Romance novels depict female sexuality as a loving, pleasurable, and above all acceptable part of being a happy woman. But when we call them smutty, dirty, or trashy books, we are negating that message. Romance novels portray life as we, women, would love it to be. One that recognizes our worth, rewards us for our confidence, and supports our choices. When we say these books are unrealistic, we are telling young girls, who might still be open-minded about their own opportunities, that they should lower their expectations. Romance novels show a variety of heroines, be they plain, pretty, plump, or skinny. They might be black, white, rich, poor, gay, or straight. But when we say only stupid women read these books, we are telling young girls that they are foolish for believing that they can be beautiful and loveable just the way they are. Even when we don't talk about romance novels, we are sending a message that women are not worth talking about and that they should be seen and not heard." [From Dangerous Books for Girls: The Bad Reputation of Romance Novels Explained by Maya Rodale, "Why It Matters How We Talk About Romance Novels"] Dangerous Books for Girls is an examination romance as genre primarily through the lens of gender. The author brought up a lot of points that I hadn't considered and constructs an interesting and well supported argument about how the romance genre isn't treated fairly (in comparison to contemporary lit or fantasy or historical fiction or literally any other genre) primarily due to its mostly female authorship and readership. The author also points out the likely role that the romance genre has played in social movements due to the inherent message of the stories. Despite romance's reputation for cringy bodice rippers and rapist 'heroes' - a reputation largely based on early to mid twentieth century books, not the modern genre - more recently published romances often are nuanced explorations of any number of issues, only organized around the axis of a relationship and invested in a hopeful conclusion. As the author points out, trashing an entire genre based on commonly appearing tropes is unfair in the extreme, prevents readers from picking up the books or respecting people who read the genre, and denigrates the kind of discussion and change that the themes are meant to promote. An equivalent would be trashing fantasy as a genre because the apocalypse (or whatever their specific variant is called) is a commonly used trope and saying that discussion of racism and fascism through the medium of Harry Potter is a worthless endeavor, people who read the Harry Potter are stupid anyways and no semi-intelligent person would stoop to picking up those kinds of books because they aren't worth the paper they're printed on. There are some people who feel that way about fantasy, but the author's point is that such people are comparatively few and far between when one takes into account the mass of people who think something similar about the romance genre, often without even realizing it. Overall, Dangerous Books for Girls was an enlightening read, and it is one that I would recommend to others.

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Good Read
*by V***V on July 20, 2018*

Enjoyed it! But know going in that it is accurately titled. The book is survey data, historical context, and analysis about why Romance has such a reputation. I still hate traditional covers, but I enjoyed thinking about a very written-by-women, read-by-women genre --- at that angle, it constantly being trashed starts to make sense given how male-centric our society is. Not a how-to-write book, so if you are looking for that, go elsewhere. The cover is horrible and you'll get grease prints on it no matter how clean your hands are.

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ every romance writer should read this book
*by H***M on October 21, 2023*

Well-researched, brilliant read! if you've ever wondered why romance gets a bad rep, this book is for you! So many well-presented arguments and sources on everything from Fabio covers to alpha heroes, from covers to happily-ever-afters, Rodale reminds us masterfully why it is important how we talk about romance novels. Highly recommend for anyone interested in the genre!

---

## Why Shop on Desertcart?

- 🛒 **Trusted by 1.3+ Million Shoppers** — Serving international shoppers since 2016
- 🌍 **Shop Globally** — Access 737+ million products across 21 categories
- 💰 **No Hidden Fees** — All customs, duties, and taxes included in the price
- 🔄 **15-Day Free Returns** — Hassle-free returns (30 days for PRO members)
- 🔒 **Secure Payments** — Trusted payment options with buyer protection
- ⭐ **TrustPilot Rated 4.5/5** — Based on 8,000+ happy customer reviews

**Shop now:** [https://www.desertcart.sn/products/15131639-dangerous-books-for-girls-the-bad-reputation-of-romance-novels](https://www.desertcart.sn/products/15131639-dangerous-books-for-girls-the-bad-reputation-of-romance-novels)

---

*Product available on Desertcart Senegal*
*Store origin: SN*
*Last updated: 2026-09-15*